In the Upper Cretaceous, a second order of batoids appears in the fossil record, the Myliobatiformes.
This order includes three superfamilies and encompasses many common representatives of the Lee
Creek fauna -- the Dasyatoidea (stingrays), Myliobatoidea (eagle and cow-nose rays) and
Mobuloidea (devil rays). Cappetta (1987) suggests that these rays evolved in the above listed order,
so this series will follow this sequence and present the stingrays, specifically the family
DASYATIDAE, first.
The teeth are small and arranged in numerous files. Females have a crushing, and males often a
clutching, dentition. Many of the challenges encountered with skate teeth are relived with the dasyatids.
The number of extant species is fewer, but there seems to be significantly less research material
available. Based upon current endeavors, the challenges appear to include: tooth position, sexual
dimorphism, and variations within the species.
Relatively few fossil species have been described, and some may be better ascribed to the
generic paleontological genus "Dasyatis" rather than the true genus as would be reflected by an
extant species. From personal experience, I have collected over a thousand dasyatoid teeth from
the mine and the DPW site. Although I currently feel that two families and four or five species are
represented, well over 800 of the teeth are currently assigned to (lumped in) a group called type-H.
If I were to segregate these teeth (which I have in part) by characteristics (crown design, foramina,
ornamentation, uvula shape, surface structure, etc.), I could come up with fifty to a hundred tooth types.
With a reasonably good sample and general adversity to "splitting," these are currently being treated
as a variation of one or two "Dasyatis" species.
As was done with the skates, it would be useful to look at the extant species of the western Atlantic
for potential stingray species that might be represented at Lee Creek, particularly in the Yorktown.
As previously discussed, the Pungo River Formation is thought to have been a subtropical environment
and the Yorktown, warm temperate. Stingrays are a common element of the batoid fauna in the
Pungo River and Yorktown which corresponds well with their warm water preference. The Bigelow &
Schroeder (1948) inventory included four likely candidates:
Dasyatis americana
HILDEBRAND &
SCHROEDER, 1928,
D. centroura (MITCHILL), 1815,
D. sabina (LESUER), 1824,
and D. sayi (LESUER), 1817.
Cappetta (1970) lists six Miocene species of the eastern Atlantic. These could certainly be potential
Lee Creek donors but no decisions have yet been made. These species include:
Dasyatis cavernosa (PROBST), 1877,
D. probsti CAPPETTA 1970,
D. serralheiroi CAPPETTA. 1970.
D. rugosa (PROBST), 1877,
D. minuta CAPPETTA, 1970,
and D. delfortriei CAPPETTA, 1970.
Lee Creek Stingray Teeth
As a percentage of the non-myliobatoid ray teeth recovered, stingray teeth are insignificantly
more common in the Pungo River (41.5%) than the Yorktown (37.5%) tailings in the mine, reflecting
a less temperature sensitive group of rays.
To obtain specimens, the best bet would be Blount Crossroads. The general lack of fine (under 2.0 mm)
material at the DPW site has two skewing influences on these batoid teeth. First, the average size
is greater at the DPW site and second, the relative abundance of dasyatoid teeth is much greater
(accounting for 85% of the recovered ray teeth).
Those thought to be dasyatid have been broadly separated by the author into three type-groups:
"H" (medium-sized with labio-lingual ridges on the transverse crest), "M" (lacking said ridges)
and "O" (other).
H-Type Teeth. (Figures 1 & 2)
When working DPW material or examining small teeth obtained directly from the mine, this is the
most abundant batoid tooth type. There are variations of these teeth, but the illustrated examples
should correspond in most cases with the majority of recovered material. Characteristics of these
teeth compare well with those of extant Dasyatis teeth.
Although twelve sub-types have been established to account for male (7) and female (5) H-type teeth,
I don't think that they represent more than two species, and would not be surprised if these are all
variations of a single species.
Female teeth are usually 2.0 - 3.0 mm in width (combining DPW samples and those from the mine)
and have a bilobate root with a globular crown. Contrary to the illustration, it is most common for
there to be a single central foramen with no lateral foramina on the lobes. The lingual face has a
median ridge and concave lateral faces. The labial face has a pitted appearance resulting
from numerous intersecting enameloid ridges. A transverse ridge is prominent, its lingual face
having numerous labio-lingually oriented ridges. Labially, it adjoins a transverse depression
which can be weak to strong; lingually, there is a single uvula, but in some specimens when
viewed occlusally, it may appear split or notched into two.
Male teeth have a bilobate root with a high cusp. They retain the pitted ornamentation on the labial
face, but the labio-lingual ridges of the lingual face of the transverse crest are not present. This
last characteristic is important when judging certain lateral and posterior teeth which may have
a reduced cusp. On the labial face of the larger cusped teeth, there is often a median depression
running down the cusp. This area may be ornamented with elongated enameloid ridges.
|
Fig. 1) "Dasyatis" sp Type "H" - [95-JAB-BC-501-S27]
- female |
|
Fig. 2) "Dasyatis" sp Type "H" - [96-JAB-TGA-432-S01]
- male |
M-Type Teeth.
Certain small (width under 2.0 mm) dasyatid-type teeth lack the labio-lingual ridges on the lingual
face of the transverse crest, have disproportionately short roots and a single central foramen.
This design, although uncommon, has been encountered in both narrow (transversely compressed)
and wide (elongated) teeth, suggesting that this observation is not just of tooth position.
Higher-crowned male variations have also been recovered.
O-Type Teeth.
Certain teeth fall outside the criteria established for the above two types. Some of these variations
may be of a pathological nature and there is certainly no reason yet to believe another group of
dasyatid teeth will eventually appear.
Other Body Parts
While surface collecting at the mine, the scutes and caudal spines of stingrays are relatively common.
The scutes are likely the dorsal denticles of stingrays, but the spines may or may not be dasyatid.
The myliobatoids (Rhinoptera, Aetobatus, and Myliobatis) also have these spines,
so they cannot quickly be ascribed to "Dasyatis". Reviewing Bigelow and Schroeder,
the cross-sections of these barbs may be a means of distinguishing families or even genera.
I haven't applied any time to this matter, but only want to alert the reader to this potential
identification problem. Besides those larger scutes and spines from the surface, most samples
from the mine produce small dermal thorns, some appear to be stingray.
Other Dasyatoids
As alluded to in the text, I currently have set aside two other groups of stingray teeth which
I don't currently consider to be dasyatid. I am awaiting clarification from a knowledgeable
source before placing a family name to these specimens. Whether or not firm conclusions
can be drawn, I hope to at least discuss these teeth before concluding this series.
Also see Dasyatis genus page